🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.